JIS Protocol

JTel Identity Standard — The complete technical specification for intent-first, semantic security over 22+ protocols

The Protocol Flow

Every JIS interaction follows this flow — from any protocol to any other, with semantic security at every step:

Input Any Protocol
→
FIR/A Trust Genesis
→
Humotica Context Layer
→
SNAFT Security Check
→
TIBET Token Generation
→
Output Any Protocol

Core Components

🤝 FIR/A

First Initiation Revoke/Accept

The trust genesis protocol. Like TCP's SYN-ACK but for identity. Establishes cryptographically verified relationships between parties.

  • Request + Humotica context
  • Capabilities + Rules response
  • Confirm + Execute

⏱️ TIBET

Time Intent Based Event Token

Micro-transaction tokens for individual actions. Each TIBET includes time-bound intent with cryptographic proof via HMAC chains.

  • Intent + Reason + Expires
  • FIR/A reference for trust chain
  • HMAC-linked to previous token

🛡️ SNAFT

Semantic Network Analysis Firewall Tool

Proactive security that blocks malicious intents BEFORE execution. Analyzes Humotica context — malware has no legitimate context.

  • Intent blocklist (injection, mining)
  • Context length validation
  • Intent-explanation coherence

⚖️ BALANS

Behavioral Analysis and Legitimacy Assessment

Risk scoring (0.0-1.0) based on complexity, Humotica quality, user trust history, and contextual factors.

  • Complexity factor
  • Humotica quality score
  • Time anomaly detection

💬 NIR

Notify, Identify, Rectify

Dialogue-based security resolution. Instead of blind blocking, NIR starts a conversation to resolve anomalies.

  • User notification
  • Identity verification
  • Action rectification

🛑 HICSS

HALT Immediate Critical System Stop

Emergency halt for threshold violations. When safety is critical, HICSS stops everything immediately.

  • Collision detection (robotics)
  • Security breach response
  • Thermodynamic critical states

🆔 HID / DID

Human ID / Device ID

Cryptographic, privacy-first identity. Each HID/DID has a unique key for HMAC token chains — no global blockchain needed.

  • did:jtel:jasper_2025
  • did:robot:robot_007
  • did:service:bank_fraud

🔗 Token Chain

Rolling HMAC Continuity

Tamper-proof audit trail. Each token cryptographically linked to previous — any modification breaks the chain.

  • 99.9% less energy than blockchain
  • Instant verification
  • No consensus needed

The FIR/A Handshake

Trust establishment between two parties — the foundation of all JIS communication:

1

INITIATE (Requester → Responder)

Send intent with Humotica context. "I want to make a verified call. Here's why: fraud alert verification from your bank."

2

CAPABILITIES (Responder → Requester)

Respond with what you can offer and your rules. "I can connect voice calls. My rules: no calls after 22:00, require caller ID."

3

CONFIRM (Requester → Responder)

Accept rules and confirm intent. Generate first TIBET token. Trust is now established.

4

EXECUTE (Both Parties)

Perform the action. Each step generates a TIBET token, linked in an HMAC chain. Full audit trail preserved.

TIBET Token Structure

// Every action generates a TIBET token tibet_token = { "intent": "initiate_secure_call", "reason": "fraud_alert_verification", "expires": "2025-11-29T12:00:00Z", // Link to trust genesis "fir_a": "GENESIS-TOKEN-BANK-USER-2024-01-15", // Humotica context (the WHY) "humotica": { "sense": "Bank fraud detection triggered", "context": "Unusual transaction pattern", "intent": "Verify with account holder", "explanation": "€5000 transfer to new recipient" }, // Cryptographic proof (unbreakable chain) "token": HMAC(user_key, prev_token || intent || timestamp) }

Supported Protocols

JIS works over 22+ protocols — translating intent, not just data:

HTTP/REST WebSocket WebRTC SIP/VoIP Matrix Email/SMTP MQTT CoAP AMQP gRPC XMPP DIDComm Bluetooth/BLE NFC LoRaWAN Zigbee Modbus OPC UA CUDA/GPU ActivityPub IPFS SSH

Key insight: N protocols need only N adapters (not N² bridges). Email → Intent → SIP works just like MQTT → Intent → HTTP.

Security Model

// Traditional security: REACTIVE (pattern-based) if request.matches(known_attack_pattern): block() // Already too late! // JIS security: PROACTIVE (intent-based) if not snaft.validate_intent(request.humotica): reject() // Before any execution! // Malware CANNOT provide valid Humotica context // - No legitimate reason for "sql_injection" // - No context for "crypto_miner" // - No explanation for "command_injection" // Result: 100% cryptojacking detection // (vs 60% with traditional pattern matching)